________________Dogs
suffer the fashion whims of their owners
They're not an accessory yet people
treat them and discard them as if they were
Recently three ladies on the bike path
in Whistler stopped their animated conversation when Callie, our golden
retriever, approached them for a pat and a sniff. The ladies happily
obliged her, all parties were pleased with the brief encounter, and
various nice remarks were made about golden retriever charm. But as they
passed by, I heard one of the women say, in reference to this breed,
"Yes, but everybody and his brother has one." I was disturbed by the
comment, not because of any personal affront, but because of the
underlying attitude it conveyed -- that pets could be valued as symbols
of status or prestige. The notion of pet as status symbol is not new,
but it seems to have reached particularly egregious heights lately.
Consider Tinkerbell, the chihuahua often seen nestled in the embrace of
Paris Hilton like the fashion accessory to which she has been reduced.
Although Tinkerbell may have stellar canine qualities of her own, one
suspects that her role is of no more significance to Hilton than the
pair of Manolos adorning her feet. The principle of celebrity
endorsement seems to operate as successfully in the matter of livestock
as it does in the sale of razor blades, and Tinkerbell has spawned a run
not only on chihuahuas but on other "tea cup" sub-breeds as well. My
sources tell me that other young lovelies such as Jessica Simpson,
Britney Spears, Hilary Duff and Tori Spelling can also frequently be
seen crushing tiny critters to their breasts.
Another trend, created in part by
media hype, is the repackaging of cross breeds to quasi- purebred
status--labra doodles, golden doodles, puggles, schnoodles, as well as
older crosses such as cock-a-poos, maltipoos and peke-a-poos.
That some of these couplings produce
wonderful specimens is a result more accidental than intended. The
primary drive behind these crosses is not the improvement of the breed's
condition but the improvement of the breeder's. You can go down to the
local pound and find a mix that suits your purposes or you can buy, say,
a labra doodle for as much as $2,500. The usual cost of a purebred dog
is only $500-$1000, so why the premium for a crossbreed? One labra
doodle owner quoted in the National Post says, "They're the newest,
sexiest yuppie dog. Everybody's looking to get one."
So what's wrong with all this? The
first casualty of popularity is usually the dog itself. A labrador-poodle
mating can yield 10 pups, twice a year. With a gestation period of 9
weeks, and with only one pair of dogs a breeder can make as much as
$50,000 per year. Puppy mills with dozens of constantly pregnant bitches
can make even more. Those experienced in the particular sub-culture of
commercial pet breeding know that fads end as quickly as they begin, and
in order to profit, they must get in on the action early. Whereas
conscientious hobby breeders will have records of generations of
offspring to guide their breeding choices, the quick-buck artists will
have no qualms about breeding and selling anything they can, regardless
of quality or suitability. During the 1980s, the shar-pei's abnormally
wrinkled skin caught the fancy of North Americans. From a narrow gene
pool of only about a dozen dogs, the number of shar-peis reached 50,000
in the US within a decade.
The breed had unrelenting skin problems, eye
problems, hip problems and unstable aggressive tendencies. By 1990, the
market had collapsed and shelters filled with unwanted shar-peis. It is
a truism in dog breeding circles that popularity is the kiss of death to
a breed. Profit-driven breeding leads to inevitable decline in the
genetic stock. The list of casualties over the years includes beloved
breeds such as the German shepherd and cocker spaniel, once robust but
now plagued with genetic problems.
Buyers who are seduced by fads may end
up buying disappointment. In the end, you have to live with your dog.
Better to choose one based on your needs rather than the capricious
fancies of the mass media.-By Moe Listein
|

FASHION. DESIGN
King Karl takes
Gotham
New York Chanel show captures Roaring Twenties
A
model wears a grey and black flowered print ruffle blouse with
matching scalloped skirt.
Karl Lagerfeld took his show on
the road to New York recently in the latest chapter of a remarkable
ride in the annals of current fashion. The Chanel designer seems to
be nearing the iconic status of Coco herself, with his trademark
immaculate white ponytail, shades and rock star attire. For the
grand Gotham event, Lagerfeld attracted models, muses, Hollywood
stars and well-heeled, well-pearled socialites to the 57th Street
flagship store. Amazingly, the boutique remained closed for more
than two days during the height of the Christmas shopping frenzy for
the showing of an even more expensive than usual collection of
bejewelled, embroidered and feathered confections. The evening show
was small, and everybody was a front-rower. There was thin-as-a-reed
Lindsay Lohan, loving Chanel in a vintage day dress strewn and
trimmed with seed pearls. "I've been wearing Chanel all day," the
actress said in her throaty voice.
Diane Kruger made haute couture
her own in a jazzy beaded dress worn with cut-off leggings, while
Ashley Olsen carried a darling red quilted bag and supermodel Helena
Christensen stood out in the sea of black by wearing head-to-toe
crimson, including sparkly red strappy sandals. On the runway,
models with crimson lips, smoky eyes and pinned-under wavy bobs
looked like Roaring Twenties dolls as a folksy trio led by Devendra
Banhart sat on the floor at the end of the runway and serenaded the
crowd. Banhart, a young, bearded man, wore a cream Chanel skirt suit
over pants.The clothes -- and steamer shiploads full of accessories
-- called on all the Chanel signatures. A cream, quilted leather
jacket with puff sleeves was decorated with coloured jewels for an
Elizabethan look. Also regal were black velvet jackets with
glittering crystal beading in the form of tiaras on the sleeves.
Tweed skirt suits were worn over satin stovepipe pants, while a wool
suit had soft camelia motifs and Pierrot-like flounces. Swirling
crystal T-strap shoes and piles of costume jewelry completed the
outfits, almost all of which were black and white. The collection,
positioned between pret-a-porter and haute couture, draws on the
work of five Parisian ateliers Chanel has bought over the past
decade. They include the legendary Lesage house for embroidery,
Massaro for shoes and Desrues for buttons and jewelry. You can
credit Lagerfeld for recreating the Chanel mystique and every one of
its signatures -- the camellia, tweed suit, quilting, and double-C
logo. And he brought the Chanel sensibility to popular culture
through H&M with a low-cost line, while establishing further
recognition for himself. In fact, one of the collectibles from the
H&M line is a T-shirt with a Warhol-esque image of Lagerfeld. Now,
Stella McCartney has gone the H&M route, and there is talk of a
Prada line, too. "It's a part of modern life," Lagerfeld said.
"Chanel and H&M can very well co-exist. I like the idea that people
who have not a lot of money can buy what I do."-By Eva Fred.
PARTIES,
COCKTAILS
New York's
Cocktail dresses are the toast of the town this season
Photo: Lagerfeld
Gallery's cocktail dresses take traditional details, such as a sheer
overlay, and twist them to make them more modern.
They're the solution for any party
and most can be adapted either for daytime or black-tie occasions."
The return of the cocktail dress is really about fashion's love
affair with all things feminine and retro-inspired," says Gregg
Andrews, fashion director at Nordstrom. The 1940s and '50s seem to
be particularly influential, he says. "We're seeing a fitted bodice,
fuller skirt -- often knee-length to mid-calf -- with a raised or
natural waist, a very defined waist." Other details are ruching,
ruffles, beading and even attached brooches. Lace and chiffon are
popular fabrics for dresses as are sheer or "illusion" fabrics that
allow you to see the skin through "a veil of fabric," Andrews says.
"It's not as overtly sexy while still being alluring." Hints of the
1920s can be seen in straighter-shaped dresses with dropped waist
and asymmetrical or handkerchief hems and a little bit of beading.
It can be magical when a woman wears a "real" cocktail dress, one
that was designed to be both chic and easy for when a woman was
indeed drinking, designer Karl Lagerfeld says. "It's an image very
much from the '50s.
Chanel, Jacques Fath and Balenciaga
were famous for 'cocktail dresses.' Women always wore hats then,"
Lagerfeld says. His fall-holiday Lagerfeld Gallery collection
features a dramatic one-shoulder sheer overlay with a high waist
over a strapless beaded sheath, and a brown sleeveless dress with a
pleated hemline, beaded waistband and white high-neck collar. "Women
are becoming more and more comfortable with the idea of dresses
because more dresses are available to them. They don't offer the
flexibility in fit that separates do, but the variety of styles
makes up for it," says Andrews. "Women are enjoying dressing in the
more feminine way that is so fashionable now." Banana Republic
executive vice president of design Deborah Lloyd is one of the
converts. "I'm wearing dresses all the time now," she says. "I love
the fact that you don't have to think so much. The top and bottom
are already together. I find them easy." One of Banana Republic's
cocktail looks is a pleated taffeta dress. "It's just one of those
dresses that works," Lloyd says. "It's very easy to wear. Who
would've thought that of a pleated cocktail dress?" Pleats can
indeed be hard to wear, but, first off, these pleats are vertical,
not horizontal. Lloyd explains that because the pleats are fine,
they create a flattering feminine line "and they'll hide things
underneath."

There also is a sheen to the
fabric and the taffeta isn't too heavy, so the dress has movement.
"This dress is nice because if you wear with denim jacket and boots,
you can wear it in the day as well," Lloyd adds.
Black is the predominant colour on
retail racks. Jewel tones, especially ruby red and teal blue, are
another option, as are metallics, including light gold and bronze.
"I like dresses that aren't too colourful. I like colours that are
non-colours. They allow you to wear the dress. You can be chic and
beautiful, but people won't see the dress walk in," Lloyd says. But
with all the choices available, Andrews suggests trying something
other than the round-neck, sleeveless black sheath that's become the
standard "little black dress." "There's nothing wrong with that
dress -- it always looks good -- but it's not this season's black
dress." Andrews predicts that dresses will be popular for the next
few fashion cycles. "We're definitely seeing dresses coming into
spring 2006," he says.-By S. Grichell.
Chocolate
may cut heart disease
Photo: The health claims of chocolate are not accepted by all.
Researchers have produced more evidence that
dark chocolate may help to reduce the risk of serious heart disease.
They found eating a few squares a day may stave off artery
narrowing and hardening in smokers by countering the disruption
caused by their habit. Smoking compromises the activity of both
endothelial cells, which line the artery walls, and platelets, which
are involved in blood clot formation. The research, by University
Hospital, Zurich, is published in Heart.
The researchers compared the effects of dark (74% cocoa
solids) and white chocolate on the smoothness of blood flow in the
arteries of 20 male smokers. Before eating 40g of chocolate, smokers
were asked to abstain from other foods rich in beneficial
antioxidants, such as onions, apples, cabbage, and cocoa products
for 24 hours. After two hours, ultrasound scans revealed that dark
chocolate significantly improved the smoothness of arterial flow -
an effect which lasted for eight hours. Blood sample analysis also
showed that dark chocolate almost halved platelet activity.
Antioxidant levels rose sharply after two hours. White chocolate had
no effect on endothelial cells, platelets, or antioxidant levels.
The researchers are convinced that the key is the high antioxidant
content of dark chocolate, which contains more per gram than other
food and drink laden with the substances, such red wine, green tea,
and berry fruits. Research published last year by the University of
California found antioxidant-rich flavonoids in chocolate helped the
blood vessels expand.
Warning: Dr Charmaine Griffiths, of the
British Heart Foundation, said: "There is some evidence that when
eaten in small quantities, dark chocolate might have some beneficial
effects on blood vessels, but as yet no study has investigated the
long-terms clinical effects - and this new, small study from
Switzerland, does not change that. "The key thing to remember about
such studies is that chocolate is a bigger part of the problem than
the solution. "Whilst dark chocolate is higher in anti-oxidants, all
forms of chocolate are very high in calories (typically about 500
calories per 100g) and contain an average 30% total fat. "We are
certainly not suggesting people never eat chocolate - everyone can
enjoy a treat from time to time. "But there are much better ways of
improving your heart health, such as eating a varied diet, including
at least five portions of fruit and vegetables a day. "And whatever
they eat, the biggest step the smokers in this study could make to
reduce their risk of heart disease would be to give up."
|
|
CONSIDERING PLASTIC SURGERY?
It is not widely known, but plastic surgery seldom,
if ever, uses any plastic. In fact, the name actually has no
connection at all with synthetic polymers (i.e., plastics). In this
sense, "plastic" derives from the Greek word plastikos meaning "to
build up or take form." Plastic surgery deals with the appearance,
form and surgical reconstruction of body tissues -- not the use of
plastic substances to do so. Plastic surgery is also much older than
most people think. The ancient Egyptians, the early
Greeks, the Hindus of India and physicians for hundreds of years
have attempted to change facial characteristics through surgery of
various sorts. However, modern techniques did not develop until
after the First World War by surgeons attempting to repair the
disfigurement of combat. The American Society of Plastic Surgeons
was formed in 1931. This marks the beginning of the true profession
of plastic surgery. Breakthroughs in plastic surgery have occurred
in the past 20 years. It is popularly believed any surgeon can
become a plastic surgeon. This is not true. Plastic surgeons require as much
or more postgraduate training than does any other surgical
specialty. It is also popularly believed that plastic surgery is a
frivolous specialty, concerned only with cosmetic facelifts, breast
enlargements, tummy tucks and such. This is also not true. More than
60% of all plastic surgery deals with reconstruction to repair
serious damage from burns, injuries or congenital abnormalities.
Less than 40% involves cosmetic
surgery for reasons of vanity only. Of these, in one year alone
(2002) in just the United States, 6.6 million people had cosmetic
plastic surgery of one kind or another. Eighty-five per cent of
these were women. The top five "cosmetic surgical procedures" for
women were: (1) breast augmentation; (2) liposuction; (3) nose
reshaping; (4) eyelid surgery; and (5) facelift. The top five
"cosmetic surgical procedures" for men were: (1) nose reshaping; (2)
liposuction; (3) eyelid surgery; (4) hair transplantation; and (5)
ear surgery. Forty-five per cent of those having cosmetic plastic
surgery were aged 35 to 50. Twenty-four per cent were aged 19 to 34.
Twenty-two per cent were aged 51 to 64. Six per cent were aged 65
and over. Three per cent were aged 18 and younger.
COULD RESEARCHERS ACCIDENTALLY
CREATE A VIRUS THAT WIPES OUT ALL HUMANS?
The answer to this has to be yes.
It sounds rather like the scenario of a B-grade science fiction
movie, but researchers around the world for many years have been
creating one deadly virus after another in the laboratory. In
January, 2001, Australian researchers experimented with viruses in
an attempt to develop a way of controlling mice that plague
Australian agriculture. They created a genetically modified (GM)
mouse-pox virus. However, this "supervirus" was far more powerful
and effective than anyone had predicted. The virus killed off 100%
of those mice exposed to it that were not immunized against it. It
also killed off half of the mice that had been immunized against it.
Mice are genetically rather similar to humans. Isn't that a
reassuring thought? The researchers reported their results in The
Journal of Virology. In 2000, Japanese researchers,
while experimenting with the virus that causes AIDS stumbled onto a
way to make HIV grow much faster. Making HIV grow faster is not
exactly what we want, but we now know how to do it. They reported
their results in AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses.-By Steven
Juan.
 |
|